Read this Blog in Any Language - Refresh for English

Showing posts with label New Age. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Age. Show all posts

Saturday, April 16, 2011

How History Creates Conflicts and Philosophy Resolves it - Why Religions and Faiths Seem to Fail

Detail of The School of Athens by Raffaello Sa...Image via Wikipedia
























What our youth lacks is Philosophy, particularly Metaphysics. The Philosophy is known as Darshan or Darshna in India which means to see the SELF or SOUL. Now, what history do we need to know the SELF and thus KNOW THYSELF is a universal and ETERNAL truth. History alone can never convince anyone no matter how great or true the facts and data is provided with most authentic way. So, the Indian Way of Wisdom Focuses on Darshna or Darshan of the God, Lord and or Self. We all pray for the Darshan and it is as if saying those who are PURE in HEART will SEE GOD. Now, to SEE GOD we need purity of heart. The self has no age and thus no history, which makes it ETERNAL. Why do we go for history has deep and intense need but after we understand its need.

If I know about Lord Rama and what to find him within I need a seeking for his Darshan which need history and philosophy. Otherwise, history is same as knowledge or big part of IT (Information Technology).

The Darhsna means Philosophy takes us away (beyond) space and time and thus we do need history after reading, the Swadhya, the Study for Self. When the desire to SEE is there history is also read. So, India is a country of philosophers and thinkers (they are known as Rishis's, Muni's, Sages and by so many other names.

What is benefit of chanting and singing name of Lord Rama, we feel his presence and thus start to love him and this Darshan with gives desire to know more about him and thus reading our Holy Ramaynan. It is relevant to most of the world religions and faiths; we start to learn about the greatness hidden in the parables and other riddles as it is in the Holy Bible. Then we get insight into the topic, we seem to want ready-made knowledge that we can feel, but metaphysically we need to understand the depth of wisdom without going for what the truth is historically or otherwise. How true are we depends up on what we have from our wisdom not from knowledge.

The knowledge is static but seems dynamic and thus can be used for any purpose. The manipulation of it can lead to controversies, conflicts and our taking no care of self. Why taking care of self, it is because self is hidden and what others see is our personality.

Wisdom is dynamic but may seem static and it is surely not static but dynamic. If we have focus on self-development, the knowledge about who and what we are in the mirror of wisdom, we can see our face of the self otherwise we may waste our life trying to please others by showing what either others want to see or we want to show.

Thus, history can be distorted and misused, the wisdom cannot be. Know Thyself cannot be made fool as we know history is collection of information and knowledge in the books and database, but wisdom is practical and one knows it without history or proofs. Why the metaphysics and all that has gone worldwide movement as New Age, New Era, Interfaith, and so on because the controversies that history can give are removed.

We at the same time seem to argue about the historical data that has conflicts. It has made all world religions and faiths as if one who believes in these is not a wise person. It seems that our focus on history has done it, and the New Age, New Era and other global movements supporting New World Order does not seem to have any conflict regarding anything.

Then why do we ignore Philosophy and Metaphysics in the Main World Religions seems a point of ignorance and when argument or conflicts seem there we tend to avoid or join some kind of movement that says things in a metaphysical way forgetting that all of it is already present in our own religious books and scriptures. Philosophy has no begining and end but history has and when we want historical facts and figures we may miss what we need KNOW THYSELF.

Thanks for your time to read it.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, January 22, 2011

How Self, Society, Nature and Soul Work Together - Human, Possessions, Life, Service and Duty

History of Indian PhilosophyImage by brewbooks via Flickr









We have 3 most popular terms used in Indian Philosophy and Religions and particularly the Metaphysics. These terms are:


1. Aadhibhotic

2. Aadhidavic

3. Aaddhiatamic 

1. Aadhibhotic means related to body and all that we possess as a human.

2. The Aadhidavic relates to what runs life as we know it the Devta's, the life givers.

3. The Aaddhiatamic relates what we are, the souls, and thus relates to our conscience and consciousness as well. Now, the body, nature and soul work in a very simple way. We know about the physical world and what we should do in it in context to body and thus social.

However, what makes us know it is the soul (through conscience and all other tools like intellect and emotions). Now, when we consider nature we learn how to deal with Society, Nature and God (in whatever form we worship).

At the physical level (aadhibhotic) society is just buildings and possessions.

At natural level, there is also presence of living ones in the society. The point of spirituality comes from practice of what nature teaches us religion or Dharma. Nature follows the Dharma without any discrimination. Thus, nature and soul together learn spirituality, nature and society practice religion as if socializing with natural world in the nature that includes us, we, the humans.

Thus, religion goes as natural socialization but spiritualism is personal socialization with nature (for theory) and society (for practice). If we serve nature, we receive help in return. However, when we serve soul, the self or conscience, we have nothing to exchange as it is our real self that does not lack anything but in return makes us intellectually and emotionally mature and thus socially strong, mature and thus self-dependent.

This self-dependency is not being able to earn to live.

The conscience is a dynamic thing and thus spirituality is also dynamic that helps us for personal, family, social, national and international development without interfering with the nature. So, the natural laws and principles are for socialization and these can be accepted at intellectual level if we hear what our conscience says not what books say otherwise we may only know and remember (memorizing) without practicing it.

In conclusion, managing family and possessions begins our religions and faiths and how we contribute to society becomes Service (Seva).

The quality and standard that service at home and in society needs that we practice spiritualism as Know Thyself to understand ourselves and thus others. It helps to bring the concept of duty into service. Now, the service is the easiest way to socialize but in spiritual socialization one have to go beyond just serving others. Lord Krishna asks Arjuna to leave all religions, the socialization and so many restrictions it imposes on an individual, group, community and people in general that prevents one to do what one ought to do for all.

It services only motives and interests of some people, who belong to receiving that service due to religious together without even deserving it and thus misuse of laws of any state or nation in modern context. How hard it is to leave the social bonds and do our duty is beyond religions but is spiritual in nature, something that nature wants from us but not the society.

As nowadays society that seem to ignore nature, natural world and its right may prevent anyone doing one's duty.

All of it needed Lord Krishna to give Sermon of Holy Gita and thus is the duty and spirit or spiritualism not just religions and faiths. However, without practicing one's own religion and faith it is difficult to understand and practice what we know as duty, the Kartvya, essence of all services and thus the excellence and quality of service.


We may not simply claim to be public servant.

The democracy that we have had during the ancient times and even few hundreds years had religion and politics working together as the Indian Kings and Queens had been. They made rules according to the religions of the state in which they lived and they followed by themselves.

Lord Rama used Dharma or religion for democracy, but it may seem that he was King and thus not democrat. All of the decisions were taken on behalf of public and the ministers were selected according to standards established in the society. The democary in it was also that there were many states with many kings.

Similarly, Lord Krishna gave Kingdom of India to Yudhishtra and himself remained under his ruling as he served as King of Mathura. There are many examples when kingship was given to many who were not family members.

In nutshell, the Panchayat Raj is the most ancient concept of democracy that India gave to human civilization as only the selected people work in it. The public have always selected the people. It has similarity with home based business that has been present in India in all ages and thus throughout the history. The children were given education and training to be what their parents were and if one excelled one could be either minister or a king and or queen.

Initially most of the Kings and Queens had small regions (state levels) and then attained training, education and skills to be at national levels. This was also democratic way. We are taught that only the mighty was the King and that is not true as one had to prove all that needs to be a king or queen. What about Akbar (With thanks from the source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akbar)and Laxmi Bai (With thanks from the source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rani_Lakshmibai)

We are not discussing the Invaders or others, who used forces. We need to learn even about not just Akbar, the great but also Sher Shah Suri (with thanks from the source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sher_Shah_Suri) to understand how Indian always have made a difference in service and duty.

The process of knowing others is not just by knowledge and data information about anyone, but as equating our personal knowledge about our self as parameter to know others. By knowing others we may not know our-self, but by knowing our-self we can know all.

Thanks for your time to read it.

Copyright by Dr. Harmander Singh-Protected and archived by World Wide OCR dot com Seal (TM) File, Canada
Depiction of Bhagavad Gita - philosophical dis...Image via WikipediaSher SchahImage via Wikipedia
Enhanced by Zemanta