Thus, you see it is not poisonous to accept that ultimately, death comes to all, and everything as a part of the creation naturally follows to the process of decay. This very process of decay is like poison, such that the world we see is decaying.
The statue would also decay. Now the clay that helps in creating the statue is also the original form of the statue. If the statue made of clay is true then it does not mean that the clay is false, that is, it does not exist. It does exist and its very existence is not irony that both are true at the same time.
The difference that exists between the statue and clay is that though both are true, yet one can refer to it, by accepting these relevant truths one at a time. This concept when used in reference to God, we do accept that He is both Visible (Sakaar also spelled as Sakar) and Invisible (Nirakaar also spelled as Nirakar).
The written words are visible and we can even hear or say it, but the meanings are invisible. Then we come across the concept of the metaphysics, in which the meanings have the mystic feelings, which are not visible. We can name a person, place or a thing, but not the mystic experiences, though some words may have use in the meanings and explanations of the words.
The words are as if the assumption according to one has according to known languages, but mystically there are no assumptions, only the experiences work instead of the words. It is going beyond the words. We are the souls not the bodies. The names are for the bodies, the physical world, not the souls, the metaphysical world. Thanks!
© Dr. Harmander Singh (© Protected and archived by WorldWideOCR.com Seal™ File)
No comments:
Post a Comment